Solutions / Writing

Three editors. One sharper page.

Draft once, get three critiques in parallel, merge the strongest lines. The page reads like you, only better.

Critique my opening paragraph for the launch post. Be honest, not polite.
ClaudeAnthropic

The first sentence works as a hook but the second backs off. You undercut the claim with a hedge in the same breath. Cut 'we believe' and let the sentence land.

GPTOpenAI

Strong verb in line one, weak verb in line three. The piece loses momentum at 'leverages'. Rewrite that sentence around the verb 'rebuilds' or 'replaces'.

GeminiGoogle

Reads like a press release more than a story. Open on the customer moment, not the feature. Move the product mention to paragraph two.

Maya verdict
High agreement

Three independent critiques agree on the same diagnosis: your opening hedges, then loses momentum. Rewrite the open around a customer moment, cut 'we believe', and replace 'leverages' with a stronger verb. Send draft 2.

What changes for you

Three voices, one tone

You stay in your voice. The room sharpens it instead of flattening it.

Critique without ego

Three independent reads catch the line you would have defended out of habit.

Faster from draft to ship

Compare versions, merge the strongest lines, and the next round is already better.

Which mind to ask

Each model leans differently. Maya keeps the differences visible.

Claude
Anthropic

Best for long-form prose, narrative arc, and careful line edits.

GPT
OpenAI

Best for tone, structure, and snappy versions of headlines and CTAs.

Gemini
Google

Best for fact-checks and pulling in fresh references inside the draft.

Where teams reach for it

    Launch posts, press releases, and narratives
    Investor and board updates
    Long-form essays with a critique pass
    Email drafts you actually want to send
    Re-writing a draft to match a specific voice
Start free

Hear from three minds, get one verdict.

New accounts get $1 of trial credit. No card required to begin.