Three independent advisors. One auditable verdict.
A thinking room for policy analysts, program teams, and public-sector leaders. Defensible answers, residency-aware, procurement-ready.
Phased delivery on an existing master agreement vendor with strict scoping per phase. Lowest procurement risk, highest delivery certainty, weakest innovation upside.
Modular procurement with three smaller contracts and a public-sector integrator as prime. Slower start, more flexible end-state, manageable under existing rules.
Hybrid: build the front-end with internal staff augmentation under a small contract, contract the back-end integration to the master vendor. Splits the risk where it actually lives.
Hybrid split: internal staff-aug for the front-end, master-agreement vendor for back-end integration. You contain procurement risk where it is highest (back-end), keep iteration speed where it matters (front-end), and stay inside the 18-month window with a credible plan B.
What changes for you
Every verdict points back to the source. Useful when a decision will be reviewed by an oversight body.
Procurement, policy, and operational angles in one room. The disagreements are the point.
Region pinning, full audit logs, BYOK on Enterprise. Built so a CIO and a CISO can both sign off.
Which mind to ask
Each model leans differently. Maya keeps the differences visible.
Best for policy memos, careful prose, and long-document briefings.
Best for structured program analysis, RFP scoring, and option papers.
Best for fact-checks against current rules, regulations, and visual content.
Where teams reach for it
Hear from three minds, get one verdict.
New accounts get $1 of trial credit. No card required to begin.