Get a verdict, not three answers.
One question, three independent advisors, one synthesised call with the trade-offs and confidence on the page.
Push back on liquidation pref and board composition before headline price. A 1x non-participating pref at $35M post is materially better than 1.5x participating at $40M.
Take the higher price only if the pref is clean. Anti-dilution clauses matter more than the headline at this stage; focus the negotiation there.
Optionality is worth more than $5M of headline. Negotiate a pro-rata right and a board observer seat instead of fighting on valuation.
Negotiate down to clean 1x non-participating pref and broad-based weighted-average anti-dilution before fighting on the headline. Trade $5M of valuation for those terms; you net more in any down-round scenario.
What changes for you
Each verdict tells you whether the room agreed or split. You stop pretending three open tabs are a decision.
Trade-offs, agreements, and the gaps still open are visible. You can defend the call in a room of humans.
The full debate is saved. You can re-open it when the call gets second-guessed three weeks from now.
Which mind to ask
Each model leans differently. Maya keeps the differences visible.
Best for ethical and human trade-offs, careful weighing of who is affected and how.
Best for fast structured pros and cons, frameworks, and broad world knowledge.
Best for fact-checking, pulling in current data, and reading visual context like screenshots or charts.
Where teams reach for it
Hear from three minds, get one verdict.
New accounts get $1 of trial credit. No card required to begin.